You may have heard murmurs about the FDA’s proposed nutrition fact label later this year. It seems appropriate for a revamp of the fact label, which was introduced to the food market in 1993. Present day increased risk of chronic diseases, has caused question of what else can be done to decrease the risk of such said diseases.
The new proposed fact labels are intended to provide more attention to calories, serving size and to emphasize the amount of sugar derived from added sugar.With a larger font and less “clutter” on the new proposed fact label, will help people more quickly discern if a product should be purchased or not.
Now that we know the type of fat, not the amount, is more important for overall health, the new label would not list calories from fat, but list the amount of fat from trans and saturated fat.
Additionally, servings would better reflect what the average American eats, not a serving size of what the suggested serving should be. For example, instead of listing it would list servings as a cup, etc. The amounts of potassium and vitamin D would also be required to be listed on the label as they are important for adequate bone growth and development.
With these proposed nutrition fact label changes, it is hoped it will help people make healthier choices. Secondly, with high blood pressure, stroke and CVD risk a concern, by having cholesterol, trans fat, saturated fat potassium and sodium content available, it shall help in the decision process.
What’re your thoughts on the new proposed changes? Do you already use nutrition facts labels when deciding to choose to purchase a food?